From: Raistlin <raistlin@linux.it>
To: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@evidence.eu.com, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch,
Fabio Checconi <fabio@gandalf.sssup.it>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:10:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254240635.7775.44.camel@Palantir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909270855.49367.henrik@austad.us>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1030 bytes --]
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 08:55 +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
> > An alternative is starting the child out with 0 runtime, and have the
> > parent run sched_setscheduler() on it giving us a clear point to run
> > admission on.
>
> Why not start it as sched_fair/sched_rt and let the child apply for
> resources the same way the parent did? That would be fairly
> straightforward and lead to predictable behaviour, and also make a nice,
> simple hook into the acceptance-tests.
>
Yeah, that's an option as well... It maybe overlap a little bit with
reset_on_fork, but I like tha fact that it allows the task itself to ask
for EDF bandwidth without having to rely on its parent... Thoughts about
that?
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa (Italy)
http://blog.linux.it/raistlin / raistlin@ekiga.net /
dario.faggioli@jabber.org
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-29 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 10:30 [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class Raistlin
2009-09-22 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 12:51 ` Raistlin
2009-09-22 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-23 12:19 ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 12:25 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-09-27 6:55 ` Henrik Austad
2009-09-29 16:10 ` Raistlin [this message]
2009-09-29 17:34 ` Chris Friesen
2009-09-30 15:58 ` Raistlin
2009-09-30 17:35 ` Chris Friesen
2009-09-22 11:58 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-22 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-24 16:08 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-22 13:24 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-22 14:01 ` Raistlin
2009-09-22 14:02 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-22 16:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 19:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 0:51 ` checkpatch as a tool (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class) Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 1:01 ` Joe Perches
2009-09-23 1:11 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 19:24 ` Andy Isaacson
2009-09-24 14:58 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:06 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-23 12:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 14:43 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-23 7:03 ` [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class Raistlin
2009-09-23 21:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-24 0:58 ` GeunSik Lim
2009-09-22 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 23:39 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-09-22 23:55 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 0:06 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-09-23 0:40 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 11:46 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 12:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 14:50 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 14:58 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 15:08 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 15:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 15:24 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:05 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-22 20:55 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 13:00 ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 13:22 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-23 14:08 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 14:45 ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 12:33 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 12:50 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 13:30 ` Raistlin
2009-09-29 18:15 ` roel kluin
2009-09-30 15:59 ` Raistlin
2009-09-24 0:34 ` GeunSik Lim
2009-09-24 6:08 ` Raistlin
2009-09-24 9:11 ` Claudio Scordino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1254240635.7775.44.camel@Palantir \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=fabio@gandalf.sssup.it \
--cc=henrik@austad.us \
--cc=johan.eker@ericsson.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=p.faure@akatech.ch \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.