From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in ftrace_profile_enable_event
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:20:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254378035.2194.37.camel@frodo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19140.13582.223629.56214@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 14:50 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> So we only allocate trace_profile_buf and trace_profile_buf_nmi if
> total_profile_count was zero on entry, but if we get an error returned
> from event->profile_enable(), we free them both unconditionally,
> regardless of the value of total_profile_count. That seems wrong. Is
> there a subtle reason why that is the right thing to do?
>
> (Also, is kfree the appropriate counterpart to alloc_percpu?)
Hi Paul,
I think you have a valid point. Frederic and I are here in Dresden (last
day). I'll make sure he sees this.
Thanks,
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-01 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-01 4:50 Possible bug in ftrace_profile_enable_event Paul Mackerras
2009-10-01 6:20 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-10-02 12:13 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-10-03 13:47 ` [GIT PULL] tracing: Perf tracing fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-03 13:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-05 17:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-06 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-03 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Check total refcount before releasing bufs in profile_enable failure Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-07 3:08 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-10-08 21:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-08 21:53 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-10-03 13:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Use free_percpu instead of kfree Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1254378035.2194.37.camel@frodo \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.