From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@hogyros.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Is volatile always verboten for FSL QE structures?
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:20:08 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254568808.7122.21.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091003095537.GA15992@honey.hogyros.de>
> Making the target of foo volatile properly rechecks the condition on
> each iteration.
>
> OTOH my PPC box runs fine, so I'm probably missing something obvious.
Probably because the IO accessors do -both- volatile casts and
add the barriers :-)
Ben.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-03 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-02 14:14 Is volatile always verboten for FSL QE structures? Michael Barkowski
2009-10-02 14:46 ` Timur Tabi
2009-10-02 16:41 ` Kumar Gala
2009-10-02 16:57 ` Michael Barkowski
2009-10-02 18:08 ` Guillaume Knispel
2009-10-03 9:55 ` Simon Richter
2009-10-03 11:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1254568808.7122.21.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=Simon.Richter@hogyros.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.