All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christopher J. PeBenito" <cpebenito@tresys.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Cc: refpolicy@oss1.tresys.com, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, js44352@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [refpolicy] [RFC PATCH v2] refpol: Add netif, node and peer constraints for MCS based policies
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:20:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254939619.29663.3.camel@gorn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091007172556.3117.39527.stgit@flek.lan>

On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 17:25 +0000, Paul Moore wrote:
> Adapt the MLS netif, node and peer networking constraints for MCS.  This patch
> preserves the basic structure of the MLS constraints and converts them to use
> the MCS model which means the "(( l1 dom l2 ) and ( l1 domby h2 ))" constraints
> are converted to "( h1 dom h2 )".

It still needs the attribute declarations, along with interfaces for
each of them.

> Signed-of-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
> ---
> 
>  policy/mcs |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/policy/mcs b/policy/mcs
> index af90ef2..5aedab8 100644
> --- a/policy/mcs
> +++ b/policy/mcs
> @@ -102,6 +102,42 @@ mlsconstrain process { sigkill sigstop }
>  	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcskillall ));
>  
>  #
> +# MCS policy for the network ingress/egress controls
> +#
> +
> +# the netif ingress/egress ops, the ingress permission is a "write" operation
> +# because the subject in this particular case is the remote domain which is
> +# writing data out the network interface which is acting as the object
> +mlsconstrain { netif } { ingress }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetinbound ) or ( t1 == unlabeled_t ));
> +mlsconstrain { netif } { egress }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetoutbound ));
> +
> +# the node recvfrom/sendto ops, the recvfrom permission is a "write" operation
> +# because the subject in this particular case is the remote domain which is
> +# writing data out the network node which is acting as the object
> +mlsconstrain { node } { recvfrom }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetinbound ) or ( t1 == unlabeled_t ));
> +mlsconstrain { node } { sendto }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetoutbound ));
> +
> +# the forward ops, the forward_in permission is a "write" operation because the
> +# subject in this particular case is the remote domain which is writing data
> +# to the network with a secmark label, the object in this case
> +mlsconstrain { packet } { forward_in }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetinbound ) or ( t1 == unlabeled_t ));
> +mlsconstrain { packet } { forward_out }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetoutbound ) or ( t1 == unlabeled_t ));
> +
> +#
> +# MCS policy for the secmark and peer controls
> +#
> +
> +# the peer/packet recv op
> +mlsconstrain { peer packet } { recv }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetread ));
> +
> +#
>  # MCS policy for SELinux-enabled databases
>  #
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> refpolicy mailing list
> refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
> http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy
-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
Subject: [refpolicy] [RFC PATCH v2] refpol: Add netif, node and peer constraints for MCS based policies
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:20:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254939619.29663.3.camel@gorn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091007172556.3117.39527.stgit@flek.lan>

On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 17:25 +0000, Paul Moore wrote:
> Adapt the MLS netif, node and peer networking constraints for MCS.  This patch
> preserves the basic structure of the MLS constraints and converts them to use
> the MCS model which means the "(( l1 dom l2 ) and ( l1 domby h2 ))" constraints
> are converted to "( h1 dom h2 )".

It still needs the attribute declarations, along with interfaces for
each of them.

> Signed-of-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
> ---
> 
>  policy/mcs |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/policy/mcs b/policy/mcs
> index af90ef2..5aedab8 100644
> --- a/policy/mcs
> +++ b/policy/mcs
> @@ -102,6 +102,42 @@ mlsconstrain process { sigkill sigstop }
>  	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcskillall ));
>  
>  #
> +# MCS policy for the network ingress/egress controls
> +#
> +
> +# the netif ingress/egress ops, the ingress permission is a "write" operation
> +# because the subject in this particular case is the remote domain which is
> +# writing data out the network interface which is acting as the object
> +mlsconstrain { netif } { ingress }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetinbound ) or ( t1 == unlabeled_t ));
> +mlsconstrain { netif } { egress }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetoutbound ));
> +
> +# the node recvfrom/sendto ops, the recvfrom permission is a "write" operation
> +# because the subject in this particular case is the remote domain which is
> +# writing data out the network node which is acting as the object
> +mlsconstrain { node } { recvfrom }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetinbound ) or ( t1 == unlabeled_t ));
> +mlsconstrain { node } { sendto }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetoutbound ));
> +
> +# the forward ops, the forward_in permission is a "write" operation because the
> +# subject in this particular case is the remote domain which is writing data
> +# to the network with a secmark label, the object in this case
> +mlsconstrain { packet } { forward_in }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetinbound ) or ( t1 == unlabeled_t ));
> +mlsconstrain { packet } { forward_out }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetoutbound ) or ( t1 == unlabeled_t ));
> +
> +#
> +# MCS policy for the secmark and peer controls
> +#
> +
> +# the peer/packet recv op
> +mlsconstrain { peer packet } { recv }
> +	(( h1 dom h2 ) or ( t1 == mcsnetread ));
> +
> +#
>  # MCS policy for SELinux-enabled databases
>  #
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> refpolicy mailing list
> refpolicy at oss.tresys.com
> http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy
-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-07 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-07 17:25 [RFC PATCH v2] refpol: Add netif, node and peer constraints for MCS based policies Paul Moore
2009-10-07 17:25 ` [refpolicy] " Paul Moore
2009-10-07 18:20 ` Christopher J. PeBenito [this message]
2009-10-07 18:20   ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2009-10-07 20:30   ` Paul Moore
2009-10-07 20:30     ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1254939619.29663.3.camel@gorn \
    --to=cpebenito@tresys.com \
    --cc=js44352@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
    --cc=refpolicy@oss1.tresys.com \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.