From: Felix Zielcke <fzielcke@z-51.de>
To: Viji V Nair <viji@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>,
reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reiser4progs-1.0.7 compilation error.
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:13:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256062393.3234.0.camel@fz.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84c89ac10910201110o5613a6edv259018698f77e285@mail.gmail.com>
Am Dienstag, den 20.10.2009, 23:40 +0530 schrieb Viji V Nair:
> Hello
>
> I have followed the the documentation you have provided, got the same
> result, version issue, here is the exact procedure I have followed.
>
> 1. Downloaded the latest stable kernel from kernel.org and applied the
> reiser4 patch.
> 2. Used the existing fedora config file as .config and added
> "CONFIG_REISER4_FS=y" in the filesystem section of the .config file
> 3. Complied and installed the new kernel without any error.
> 4. Rebooted the system from the newly installed kernel
> # uname -a
> Linux test01 2.6.31.4 #2 SMP Tue Oct 20 02:35:04 IST 2009 x86_64
> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> # cat /etc/fedora-release
> Fedora release 11 (Leonidas)
>
> 5. Downloaded the libaal from the following link
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/fs/reiser4/libaal/libaal-1.0.5.tar.bz2
>
> installed to /usr/local and added the lib path to ld.so.conf, the did
> an ldconfig
>
> 6. Downloaded reiser4progs from the following link
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/fs/reiser4/reiser4progs/reiser4progs-1.0.7.tar.bz2
>
> tried to install,
>
> CFLAGS="-fno-stack-protector -I/usr/local/include"
> LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib" ./configure
>
> got the same result (simple ./configure is also giving the same result)
>
> <snip>
> checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no
> checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... no
> configure: WARNING: Can't detect right _FILE_OFFSET_BITS. Will be
> forced to 64bit.
> checking for off_t... yes
> checking size of off_t... 8
> checking for aal_device_open in -laal... yes
> checking aal/libaal.h usability... yes
> checking aal/libaal.h presence... yes
> checking for aal/libaal.h... yes
> checking for libaal version = 1.0.5... no
> </snip>
>
> I am running the latest updated fedora 11, x86_64. There is a fresh
> installation, after that did a yum update.
>
> Did i miss anything?
>
Maybe config.log tells something useful why the check for libaal failed.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-20 8:35 reiser4progs-1.0.7 compilation error Viji V Nair
2009-10-20 11:03 ` Edward Shishkin
2009-10-20 11:42 ` Viji V Nair
2009-10-20 12:32 ` Edward Shishkin
2009-10-20 18:10 ` Viji V Nair
2009-10-20 18:13 ` Felix Zielcke [this message]
2009-10-20 18:55 ` Viji V Nair
2009-10-20 19:01 ` Felix Zielcke
2009-10-20 19:23 ` Edward Shishkin
2009-10-20 19:29 ` Viji V Nair
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256062393.3234.0.camel@fz.local \
--to=fzielcke@z-51.de \
--cc=edward.shishkin@gmail.com \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viji@fedoraproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.