RE: [PATCH 01/17] PM: fix suspend control for IVA2

[Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>]

On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley
> > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 5:24 AM
> 
> > > IVA2 controls its target power state individually, thus suspend should not
> > > touch IVA2. Without this patch DSP suspend always fails.
> >
> > We don't allow other device drivers to touch PRCM bits, so we should
> > probably should remove all PRCM register accesses from the DSPBridge code,
> > so all power control should go through the ARM.
> >
> > Is there a reason why the ARM code can't handle the DSP powerdomain?
> 
> Sharing with DSP is something which probably could use some improvement.
> 
> Today DSP self-manages its domain.  Its (bios) micro-kernel makes decisions to optimize its domain. The ARM can't really micro-manage the DSP as he doesn't even want to know at the detail level what the DSP is up to at every instant.
> 
> - During idle time cpuidle should just be checking dsp status to see if its current state gets in the way of a low c-state.
> 
> - bridge does register with suspend frame work so he should do the right thing when in the system.
> 
> * problem is when bridge isn't there what to do.  This is especially after an unload of the bridge.

Just a side note reminder: bridge does not exist in the real world.

[dedekind@sauron linux-omap-2.6]\$ ls drivers/dsp/bridge
ls: cannot access drivers/dsp/bridge: No such file or directory

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html