From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1N27id-0006Gf-19 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:21:31 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N27ia-0006Fr-PJ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:21:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N27iV-0006BJ-8L for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:21:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60647 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N27iV-0006B6-2x for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:21:23 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:52991) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N27iU-000304-ID for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:21:22 -0400 Received: from [85.180.53.67] (e180053067.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.53.67]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LcmP9-1MJk0d0J5b-00jd91; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:21:20 +0100 From: Felix Zielcke To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20090810152818.GD11134@thorin> References: <1248955606.6598.51.camel@fz.local> <4A719AA4.3000905@gmail.com> <1248968735.27471.40.camel@mj> <20090731161958.GJ14675@thorin> <1249910726.3579.12.camel@fz.local> <20090810152818.GD11134@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:21:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1256494879.3317.0.camel@fz.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX197XIbwqtvTvRmeGFEtY9PxCgxjJJxawRlJFqj QxWJdW9ZlJWLVcfL0tbmSyZaMIIZ19WShXPWl9rY/43xRz5z9I S2Jz3SCA3miKg/w0je4HdIp1GDMZmcj X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:21:29 -0000 Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 17:28 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 03:25:26PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 18:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:45:35AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: > > > > > Felix Zielcke escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed= . > > > > > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hope= fully > > > > > > comes before December) > > > > > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. > > > >=20 > > > > I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hope = that > > > > GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't see = how > > > > Debian can have any problem with that. > > >=20 > > > It depends. If we say GRUB 2 is "under development" but we don't say= anything > > > about GRUB Legacy, people might think GRUB 2 is not ready. > > >=20 > > > I agree with Pavel, saying GRUB 2 is under development doesn't fail t= o the > > > truth, but then again there are many ways of saying the truth. I thi= nk we > > > should make the website give a clear message that: > > >=20 > > > a) GRUB Legacy is obsolete and we don't longer support it > > >=20 > > > b) GRUB 2 is more mature than GRUB Legacy > > >=20 > >=20 > > Good idea. I just think that I'm not good at proposing a good wording > > for it. > > And maybe we should wait untill 1.97 gets released before telling grub2 > > is more mature then grub-legacy. >=20 > Agreed. We don't want to lead anyone into using 1.96. Now that 1.97 finally is released (yehaw), does anyone have a good wording for the website? --=20 Felix Zielcke Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer