From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1N2DWs-00035S-3Q for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:33:46 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N2DWq-00034O-HV for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:33:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N2DWm-00033g-2y for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:33:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54873 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N2DWl-00033d-U7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:33:39 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:54844) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N2DWl-0004Hi-ED for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:33:39 -0400 Received: from [85.180.53.67] (e180053067.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.53.67]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LkRpr-1MVtiU1dWt-00cIrI; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:33:37 +0100 From: Felix Zielcke To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <1256494879.3317.0.camel@fz.local> References: <1248955606.6598.51.camel@fz.local> <4A719AA4.3000905@gmail.com> <1248968735.27471.40.camel@mj> <20090731161958.GJ14675@thorin> <1249910726.3579.12.camel@fz.local> <20090810152818.GD11134@thorin> <1256494879.3317.0.camel@fz.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:33:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1256517216.3317.21.camel@fz.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/isLI7dRRtdb3VTilYFNx22/AdlW5g66iiucj qBY3CTkp9HNVMgomy6RhNwTLjrfT1/W5TysDsI+9fylV94Q8pt vjZ14sTu2lZDYYJfNpUy0PU80DPXAAJ X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:33:44 -0000 Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2009, 19:21 +0100 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 17:28 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 03:25:26PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > > Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 18:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:45:35AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: > > > > > > Felix Zielcke escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > > > I think the currently under development part can be now remov= ed. > > > > > > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which ho= pefully > > > > > > > comes before December) > > > > > > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. > > > > >=20 > > > > > I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hop= e that > > > > > GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't se= e how > > > > > Debian can have any problem with that. > > > >=20 > > > > It depends. If we say GRUB 2 is "under development" but we don't s= ay anything > > > > about GRUB Legacy, people might think GRUB 2 is not ready. Oh I even forgot that there was in the meanwhile even someone in #grub who was a bit scared of GRUB 2 because of this sentence. But luckly not that scared to not ask how stable it is now. --=20 Felix Zielcke Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer