From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian J. Murrell Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Lustre-devel] lustre in upstream In-Reply-To: <4AE2FB20.80509@gmail.com> References: <4AE2FB20.80509@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1256658181.16338.27.camel@pc.interlinx.bc.ca> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org [ I've dropped the fsdevel list as I likely don't have permission to post there -- I am not subscribed. ] On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 15:03 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > hi, Hi, > May I ask you when clusterfs The name of the product is Lustre, not clusterfs. > is going to be merged in kernel.org code ? Probably only likely once we no longer require kernel patches for the servers. Maybe never. AFAIU, we have tried in the past and met so much residence that it was consuming too much developer time and impacting our ongoing development. > Six years since 1.0 release, and it still is out. Yup. I am sure there is a lot of history on LKML that you could read up on. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: