From: dan.j.williams@intel.com (Dan Williams)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] iop: implement sched_clock()
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:43:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256686998.26589.6.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19174.53502.967101.548629@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 03:52 -0700, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Thanks. Looks sane to me, although the extra load in sched_clock() does
> bother me.
I looked into it a bit more. The following patch also works for me and
matches iop3xx.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-xsc3.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-xsc3.S
index 2028f37..fab134e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-xsc3.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-xsc3.S
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ __xsc3_setup:
orr r4, r4, #0x18 @ cache the page table in L2
mcr p15, 0, r4, c2, c0, 0 @ load page table pointer
- mov r0, #0 @ don't allow CP access
+ mov r0, #1 << 6 @ cp6 access for early sched_clock
mcr p15, 0, r0, c15, c1, 0 @ write CP access register
mrc p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1 @ get auxiliary control reg
I'll fold this into your patch.
> I wonder if the exception could be handled by an exception handler
> that just forces the return value to zero, similar to how the x86
> kernel handles bad get_user/put_user calls or accesses to potentially
> invalid (x86) MSRs?
This is what arch/arm/plat-iop/cp6.c does, it is just registered too
late to cover the early calls to sched_clock(), so we need to turn on
cp6 access early.
> Why whould anyone want to prevent the kernel from accessing cp6?
Kernel accesses are fine the trick is turning off access when returning
to userspace, and automatically turning access on when the kernel needs
it (via undefined instruction trap). Doing it dynamically eliminates
cp6 enable/disable code sprinkled throughout the kernel (commit
4434c5c7)
--
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-16 22:00 [PATCH v3 4/4] iop: implement sched_clock() Mikael Pettersson
2009-10-22 21:49 ` Dan Williams
2009-10-22 22:17 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-10-23 12:04 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-10-26 18:34 ` Dan Williams
2009-10-27 10:52 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-10-27 23:43 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2009-10-23 17:12 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256686998.26589.6.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.