From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756555AbZKDPWa (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:22:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756376AbZKDPWa (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:22:30 -0500 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:44795 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756225AbZKDPW3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:22:29 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup From: Dave Hansen To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Dhaval Giani , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Bharata B Rao , libcg-devel , "menage@google.com" , Jan Safranek In-Reply-To: <20091104081618.GD3560@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20091104063005.GC3560@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20091104154024.0b8f6123.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091104081618.GD3560@balbir.in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:21:57 -0800 Message-Id: <1257348117.31972.4360.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:46 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > The reason I liked /dev/cgroup was because cpusets could be > mounted at /dev/cpuset or /dev/cgroup/cpuset. My concern with /cgroup > is that a ls "/" now becomes larger in size. But I'll take your vote > for it as +1 for /cgroup. /dev/pts is a decent precedent for doing it under /dev, although it does deal with actual devices. cgroups do not. -- Dave