From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
alex.shi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: UDP-U stream performance regression on 32-rc1 kernel
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:03:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257404598.6406.11.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257398417.6401.27.camel@marge.simson.net>
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 06:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 10:20 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:07 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > > Can you try the below, and send me
> > I tested it on Nehalem machine against the latest tips kernel. netperf loopback
> > result is good and regression disappears.
>
> Excellent. Ingo has picked up a version in tip (1b9508f) which has zero
> negative effect on my x264 testcase, and is a win for mysql+oltp through
> the whole test spectrum. As that may (dunno, Ingo?) now be considered a
> regression fix, ie candidate for 32.final, testing that it does no harm
> to your big machines would be a good thing. (pretty please?:)
Egad. Size XXL difference on my cheap Q6600 box
git v2.6.32-rc6-26-g91d3f9b
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
65536 4096 60.00 7793073 0 4256.06
65536 60.00 7780487 4249.18
git v2.6.32-rc6-26-g91d3f9b + 1b9508f
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
65536 4096 60.00 15133547 0 8264.93
65536 60.00 15131466 8263.80
tip v2.6.32-rc6-1796-gd995f1d
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
65536 4096 60.00 13998562 0 7645.08
65536 60.00 13986112 7638.28 (uhoh, tinker time.)
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-05 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-03 3:47 UDP-U stream performance regression on 32-rc1 kernel Alex Shi
2009-11-03 4:33 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-11-03 9:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-03 17:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-04 1:55 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-11-04 12:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-05 2:20 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-11-05 5:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-05 7:03 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-11-05 8:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-05 7:44 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-11-05 8:10 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1257404598.6406.11.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.