From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Spencer Candland <spencer@bluehost.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: utime/stime decreasing on thread exit
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:31:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257787903.4108.345.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091109172020.GA7751@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 18:20 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > I just checked .22 and there we seem to hold p->sighand->siglock over
> > the full task iteration.
>
> Yes. Then thread_group_cputime() was changed so that it didn't itearate
> over sub-threads, then this callsite was move outside of ->siglock, now
> it does while_each_thread() again.
>
> > So we might as well revert back to that if
> > people really mind counting things twice :-)
>
> Stanislaw has already sent the patch, but I don't know what happened
> with this patch:
>
> [PATCH 1/2] posix-cpu-timers: avoid do_sys_times() races with __exit_signal()
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124505545131145
That patch has the siglock in the function calling
thread_group_cputime(), the 22 code had it near the loop proper, which
to me seems a more sensible thing, since there could be more callers,
no?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 0:23 utime/stime decreasing on thread exit Spencer Candland
2009-11-04 6:49 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-05 5:24 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-09 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-09 17:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-09 17:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-09 17:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-11-09 19:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-09 19:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-10 10:44 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-10 17:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-10 18:24 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-10 19:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-17 12:48 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-17 12:57 ` [PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: reset expire cache when no timer is running Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-10 5:42 ` utime/stime decreasing on thread exit Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-10 5:47 ` [PATCH] fix granularity of task_u/stime() Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-11 12:11 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-12 0:00 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-12 2:49 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-12 2:55 ` Américo Wang
2009-11-12 4:16 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-12 4:33 ` [PATCH] fix granularity of task_u/stime(), v2 Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-12 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-12 14:49 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-12 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-12 15:40 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-13 12:42 ` [PATCH] sys_times: fix utime/stime decreasing on thread exit Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-13 13:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 14:12 ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-13 15:36 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-13 17:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-16 19:32 ` [PATCH] fix granularity of task_u/stime(), v2 Spencer Candland
2009-11-17 13:08 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-17 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-19 18:17 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-20 2:00 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-23 10:09 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-23 10:16 ` [PATCH] cputime: avoid do_sys_times() races with __exit_signal() Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-30 9:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] cputime: remove prev_{u,s}time if VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-30 9:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] cputime: introduce thread_group_times() Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-30 14:54 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-12-01 1:02 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-12-02 8:26 ` [PATCH -v2 1/2] sched, cputime: cleanups related to task_times() Hidetoshi Seto
2009-12-02 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-02 15:29 ` Balbir Singh
2009-12-03 0:21 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-12-02 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-02 17:33 ` [tip:sched/core] sched, cputime: Cleanups " tip-bot for Hidetoshi Seto
2009-12-02 8:28 ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] sched, cputime: introduce thread_group_times() Hidetoshi Seto
2009-12-02 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-02 17:33 ` [tip:sched/core] sched, cputime: Introduce thread_group_times() tip-bot for Hidetoshi Seto
2009-12-02 8:29 ` reproducer: utime decreasing Hidetoshi Seto
2009-12-02 8:32 ` reproducer: invisible utime Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-23 10:25 ` [PATCH] fix granularity of task_u/stime(), v2 Balbir Singh
2009-11-23 10:46 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-24 5:33 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-18 22:38 ` Spencer Candland
2009-11-23 9:52 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-12 18:12 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix granularity of task_u/stime() tip-bot for Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-13 9:40 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-11-13 23:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 2:44 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1257787903.4108.345.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=spencer@bluehost.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.