From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [12.173.51.132] (helo=emailgateway.hillcrestlabs.com)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <Chris.Conroy@hillcrestlabs.com>) id 1N8yZy-0003dI-VP
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:00:58 +0100
X-AuditID: 0a1e000a-b7b8cae000000d7b-cd-4afd82662d5f
From: Chris Conroy <Chris.Conroy@hillcrestlabs.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
In-Reply-To: <200911130219.56218.holger+oe@freyther.de>
References: <200911120457.39018.holger+oe@freyther.de>
	<1258038869.4924.67.camel@conroy-linux>
	<1258039776.4924.69.camel@conroy-linux>
	<200911130219.56218.holger+oe@freyther.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:58:34 -0500
Message-Id: <1258127914.4913.26.camel@conroy-linux>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 12.173.51.132
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Chris.Conroy@hillcrestlabs.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure
Subject: Re: meta-toolchain continues to woe
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:00:58 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 02:19 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Thursday 12 November 2009 16:29:36 Chris Conroy wrote:
> > > I submitted a patch to opkg back in September to fix this error message
> > > to be a bit more useful. If you upgrade to opkg >=216 it will save you
> > > some headaches whenever this error occurs.
> > 
> > Apologies. I should have read your error message more closely since it
> > looks like you are getting the extra debug information from my patch.
> > Feel free to make a patch with more debug info for said error or just
> > let me know what you think would be appropriate and I can submit a new
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Koen recently upgraded opkg* to something above >= 216.
> 
> regards
> 	holger

Hence my second message where I realized that and apologized for my
idiocy :P

--Chris