All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (gfs2)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:59:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258538386.2904.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091118082846.170413359@intel.com>

Hi,

That looks ok to me, modulo the warnings below. The only "non-obvious"
thing in this area which the GFS2 writepage[s] code relies upon is the
assumption that if we have a ->writepages() then ->writepage() will
never be called from a context which requires the fs to actually do a
write (i.e. the fs can refuse this if required). That is also only the
case for journaled data files - normal writes don't have that
requirement.

 CC [M]  fs/gfs2/aops.o
fs/gfs2/aops.c: In function ‘gfs2_write_jdata_pagevec’:
fs/gfs2/aops.c:272: warning: unused variable ‘bdi’
fs/gfs2/aops.c: In function ‘gfs2_write_cache_jdata’:
fs/gfs2/aops.c:336: warning: unused variable ‘bdi’

Once the warnings are fixed:

Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

Do you want me to add this patch into my tree, or were you planning to
submit via a different tree?

Steve.

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 16:26 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> plain text document attachment
> (writeback-remove-congested-checks-linux_fs_gfs2_aops.patch)
> No one is calling wb_writeback and write_cache_pages with
> wbc.nonblocking=1 any more. And lumpy pageout will want to do
> nonblocking writeback without the congestion wait.
> 
> CC: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/aops.c |   10 ----------
>  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux.orig/fs/gfs2/aops.c	2009-11-06 09:22:35.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/fs/gfs2/aops.c	2009-11-06 09:52:15.000000000 +0800
> @@ -313,11 +313,6 @@ static int gfs2_write_jdata_pagevec(stru
>  
>  		if (ret || (--(wbc->nr_to_write) <= 0))
>  			ret = 1;
> -		if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
> -			wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
> -			ret = 1;
> -		}
> -
>  	}
>  	gfs2_trans_end(sdp);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -348,11 +343,6 @@ static int gfs2_write_cache_jdata(struct
>  	int scanned = 0;
>  	int range_whole = 0;
>  
> -	if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
> -		wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
>  	pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
>  	if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
>  		index = mapping->writeback_index; /* Start from prev offset */
> 
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (gfs2)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:59:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258538386.2904.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091118082846.170413359@intel.com>

Hi,

That looks ok to me, modulo the warnings below. The only "non-obvious"
thing in this area which the GFS2 writepage[s] code relies upon is the
assumption that if we have a ->writepages() then ->writepage() will
never be called from a context which requires the fs to actually do a
write (i.e. the fs can refuse this if required). That is also only the
case for journaled data files - normal writes don't have that
requirement.

 CC [M]  fs/gfs2/aops.o
fs/gfs2/aops.c: In function ‘gfs2_write_jdata_pagevec’:
fs/gfs2/aops.c:272: warning: unused variable ‘bdi’
fs/gfs2/aops.c: In function ‘gfs2_write_cache_jdata’:
fs/gfs2/aops.c:336: warning: unused variable ‘bdi’

Once the warnings are fixed:

Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

Do you want me to add this patch into my tree, or were you planning to
submit via a different tree?

Steve.

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 16:26 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> plain text document attachment
> (writeback-remove-congested-checks-linux_fs_gfs2_aops.patch)
> No one is calling wb_writeback and write_cache_pages with
> wbc.nonblocking=1 any more. And lumpy pageout will want to do
> nonblocking writeback without the congestion wait.
> 
> CC: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/aops.c |   10 ----------
>  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux.orig/fs/gfs2/aops.c	2009-11-06 09:22:35.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/fs/gfs2/aops.c	2009-11-06 09:52:15.000000000 +0800
> @@ -313,11 +313,6 @@ static int gfs2_write_jdata_pagevec(stru
>  
>  		if (ret || (--(wbc->nr_to_write) <= 0))
>  			ret = 1;
> -		if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
> -			wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
> -			ret = 1;
> -		}
> -
>  	}
>  	gfs2_trans_end(sdp);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -348,11 +343,6 @@ static int gfs2_write_cache_jdata(struct
>  	int scanned = 0;
>  	int range_whole = 0;
>  
> -	if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
> -		wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
>  	pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
>  	if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
>  		index = mapping->writeback_index; /* Start from prev offset */
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-18  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-18  8:26 [PATCH 00/12] trivial writeback cleanups/fixes Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 01/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 02/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (write_cache_pages) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 03/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (pohmelfs) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-19  8:11   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-19 11:04     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-11-20  1:53       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-21 11:23         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 04/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (afs) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-19  8:09   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-19 16:51     ` David Howells
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 05/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (cifs) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 06/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (gfs2) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18  9:59   ` Steven Whitehouse [this message]
2009-11-18  9:59     ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-11-18 10:09     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 11:13       ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-11-18 11:13         ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 07/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (xfs) Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 21:27   ` Dave Chinner
2009-11-19  8:05     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-20  7:24       ` Dave Chinner
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 08/12] ext4: remove encountered_congestion trace Wu Fengguang
2009-11-24 16:18   ` tytso
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 09/12] ext4: remove unused parameter wbc from __ext4_journalled_writepage() Wu Fengguang
2009-11-24 16:18   ` tytso
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] writeback: remove the always false bdi_cap_writeback_dirty() test Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18  8:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] writeback: introduce wbc.for_background Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18  8:27 ` [PATCH 12/12] bdi: use bdi_stat_sum() for more accurate debugfs stats Wu Fengguang
2009-11-18 10:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-19  7:59     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-11-19  8:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-19  8:17         ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1258538386.2904.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.