From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from static.26.116.47.78.clients.your-server.de ([78.47.116.26]
	helo=drlauer-research.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mickey@vanille-media.de>) id 1NBUfZ-0005uv-Oy
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:41:08 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.150] (e180135046.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.135.46])
	by drlauer-research.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A39584AED
	for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:26:23 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <mickey@vanille-media.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
In-Reply-To: <200911201531.00181.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl>
References: <he689r$c57$1@ger.gmane.org> <4B06A6A7.1080204@SSpaeth.de>
	<200911201531.00181.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl>
Organization: Vanille-Media
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:39:41 +0100
Message-ID: <1258727981.13348.7.camel@opal>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.26
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mickey@vanille-media.de
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure
Subject: Re: MACHINE_FEATURE changes
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:41:08 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:30 +0100 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
> Dnia pi=C4=85tek, 20 listopada 2009 o 15:24:39 Sebastian Spaeth napisa=C5=
=82(a):
>=20
> > Better suggestions on how to achieve this are welcome.
>=20
> In distro config:
>=20
> MACHINE_FEATURES_om-gta01 =3D "this that those butnoapm"
>=20
> This way your distro has what you want and others have what was set in =
machine=20
> config.

Good idea.

For the records though, I would consider it being the machine
maintainer's call to define the machine config. If he decides that apm
is very misleading on said machine, perhaps because without taking
special care about the peripheral devices there will no be proper
suspend in the first place, then I might be inclined to follow this
reasoning and leave apm out there...

:M: