From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from static.26.116.47.78.clients.your-server.de ([78.47.116.26] helo=drlauer-research.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NBUvQ-0007rR-Vw for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:57:32 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.150] (e180135046.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.135.46]) by drlauer-research.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898A258410F for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:42:46 +0100 (CET) From: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <4B06A6A7.1080204@SSpaeth.de> <200911201531.00181.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> <1258727981.13348.7.camel@opal> Organization: Vanille-Media Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:56:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1258728964.13348.12.camel@opal> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.26 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mickey@vanille-media.de X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: MACHINE_FEATURE changes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:57:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: > On 20-11-09 15:39, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:30 +0100 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz: > >> Dnia pi=C4=85tek, 20 listopada 2009 o 15:24:39 Sebastian Spaeth napi= sa=C5=82(a): > >> > >>> Better suggestions on how to achieve this are welcome. > >> > >> In distro config: > >> > >> MACHINE_FEATURES_om-gta01 =3D "this that those butnoapm" > >> > >> This way your distro has what you want and others have what was set = in machine > >> config. > > > > Good idea. > > > > For the records though, I would consider it being the machine > > maintainer's call to define the machine config. If he decides that ap= m > > is very misleading on said machine, perhaps because without taking > > special care about the peripheral devices there will no be proper > > suspend in the first place, then I might be inclined to follow this > > reasoning and leave apm out there... >=20 > If that's the case, it should be at least noted in the commit message=20 > clearly. In this case it was a commit from someone very new to OE and i= t=20 > didn't include any explanation or SOBs or ACKs. True. Since according to the MAINTAINERS file I seem to be the maintainer of this machine I think i will reserve my right to change it then. Distros which absolutely want apm on those Openmoko devices can still include it. > Since this is about the machine the is the default in our GettingStarte= d=20 > wiki, a mail to this list would have been nice as well, if only to=20 > increase the google juice :) Heh, right. :M: