All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN handling in Linux/NFS
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:58:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258747113.2494.81.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091117042123.1563.20912.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 15:21 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: 
> NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN is returned by the server when an operation cannot be
> performed because the file is currently open and local (to the server)
> semantics prohibit the operation while the file is open.
> A typical case is a RENAME operation on an MS-Windows platform, which
> prevents rename while the file is open.
> 
> While it is possible that such a condition is transitory, it is also
> very possible that the file will be held open for an extended period
> of time thus preventing the operation.
> 
> The current behaviour of Linux/NFS is to retry the operation
> indefinitely.  This is not appropriate - we do not expect a rename to
> take an arbitrary amount of time to complete.
> 
> Rather, an error should be returned.  The most obvious error code
> would be EBUSY, which is a legal at least for 'rename' and 'unlink',
> and accurately captures the reason for the error.
> 
> This patch allows a few retries until about 2 seconds have elapsed,
> then returns EBUSY.
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
> 
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |    5 +++++
>  fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c  |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index ff37454..be26c0c 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -275,6 +275,11 @@ static int nfs4_handle_exception(const struct nfs_server *server, int errorcode,
>  			/* FALLTHROUGH */
>  #endif /* !defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1) */
>  		case -NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN:
> +			if (exception->timeout > HZ)
> +				/* We have retried a decent amount, time to
> +				 * fail
> +				 */
> +				break;
>  		case -NFS4ERR_GRACE:
>  		case -NFS4ERR_DELAY:
>  			ret = nfs4_delay(server->client, &exception->timeout);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
> index 20b4e30..e50246d 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
> @@ -5684,6 +5684,7 @@ static struct {
>  	{ NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,	-ELOOP		},
>  	{ NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL,	-EOPNOTSUPP	},
>  	{ NFS4ERR_DEADLOCK,	-EDEADLK	},
> +	{ NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN,	-EBUSY		},
>  	{ NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC,	-EPERM		}, /* FIXME: this needs
>  						    * to be handled by a
>  						    * middle-layer.
> 
> 

If you add an entry for NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN into nfs4_stat_to_errno(),
then the result of the RPC call will be -EBUSY rather than
NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN.
In that case, I can't see how the NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN is being propagated
to nfs4_handle_exception().

See
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git&a=commitdiff&h=52567b03ca38b6e556ced450d64dba8d66e23b0e for how we fixed up a similar problem with NFS4ERR_RESOURCE...

Cheers
  Trond

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-20 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-17  4:21 [PATCH 0/2] Some fixes for NFS NeilBrown
     [not found] ` <20091117042004.1563.95871.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-17  4:21   ` [PATCH 2/2] NFS: honour preferred rsize/wsize reported by server NeilBrown
2009-11-17  4:21   ` [PATCH 1/2] NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN handling in Linux/NFS NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20091117042123.1563.20912.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-20 19:58       ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2009-11-24  2:56         ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1258747113.2494.81.camel@localhost \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.