All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@comx.dk>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Hackers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robert Olsson <robert@herjulf.net>
Subject: Strange CPU load when flushing route cache (kernel 2.6.31.6)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:58:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258970332.29747.262.camel@jdb-workstation> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1255 bytes --]

Hi Eric and netdev,

I have observed a strange route cache behaviour when I upgraded some
of my production Linux routers (1Gbit/s tg3) to kernel 2.6.31.6 (from
kernel 2.6.25.7).

Every time the route cache is flushed I get a CPU spike (in softirq)
with a tail.  I have attached some graphs that illustrate the issue
(hope vger.kernel.org will allow these attachments...)


I have done some tuning of the route cache:

 # From /etc/sysctl.conf
 #
 # Adjusting the route cache flush interval
 net/ipv4/route/secret_interval = 1200

 # Limiting the route cache size
 # ip_dst_cache slab objects is 256 bytes.
 # 2000000 * 256 bytes = 512 MB
 net/ipv4/route/max_size = 2000000

Boot parameters: "rhash_entries=262143 vmalloc=256M"

The rhash_entries is for the route cache hash size.  The vmalloc is
needed because I have _very_ large iptables rulesets (and is running
on a 32-bit kernel, due to old hardware).

Any thoughs on how to avoid these CPU spikes?
Or where the issue occurs in the code?

-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
  Jesper Brouer
  ComX Networks A/S
  Linux Network Kernel Developer
  Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.CS
  Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

[-- Attachment #2: CPU_usage.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 16710 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: CPU_usage_softirq.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 15344 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: PPS_eth1-rx.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 10930 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #5: route_cache.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 17499 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #6: softnet_time_squeeze.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 15145 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2009-11-23 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-23  9:58 Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2009-11-23 10:29 ` Strange CPU load when flushing route cache (kernel 2.6.31.6) Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 12:28   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-23 13:25     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 13:48       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-23 14:03         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-26 10:51           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-26 11:05             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 15:07 ` robert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1258970332.29747.262.camel@jdb-workstation \
    --to=jdb@comx.dk \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert@herjulf.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.