From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from emailgateway.hillcrestlabs.com ([12.173.51.132]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NCdjO-0008Dk-Rs for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:33:49 +0100 X-AuditID: 0a1e000a-b7b8cae000000d7b-82-4b0ad5313d65 From: Chris Conroy To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <4B0AC426.3030505@2net.co.uk> References: <1258901140-30575-1-git-send-email-bernhard.kaindl@gmx.net> <1258990008.8426.29.camel@conroy-linux> <4B0AC426.3030505@2net.co.uk> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:31:48 -0500 Message-Id: <1259001108.19077.4.camel@conroy-linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 12.173.51.132 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Chris.Conroy@hillcrestlabs.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [PATCH] external-toolchain: Really accept toolchains built by meta-toolchain.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:33:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:19 +0000, Chris Simmonds wrote: > meta-toolchain does generate environment-setup and so far as I am aware > it works fine as a stand-alone toolchain. Is there some reason why I > should not be using it as such? > > Chris S. It's fine as just a standalone toolchain. It's just not a "Build Platform." Meaning, you can't just source it and get all the other things that OE gives you. This is perhaps too obvious to even warrant mentioning. I misinterpreted the original patch since I was comparing against my local tree, where we've modified to check for environment-setup rather than package-status (simply as a sanity check for the setting of ${prefix}, so you can safely disregard my previous posting. --Chris