From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 2/7] sched: Bandwidth initialization for fair task groups
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:09:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1259942997.17907.896.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091117143439.GM17335@in.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 20:04 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> +/*
> + * TODO: Check if this kind of timer setup is sufficient for cfs or
> + * should we do what rt is doing.
> + */
> +static void start_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg)
is there a reason not to do as rt does?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-04 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-17 14:33 [RFC v4 PATCH 0/7] CFS Hard limits - v4 Bharata B Rao
2009-11-17 14:34 ` [RFC v4 PATCH 1/7] sched: Rename sched_rt_period_mask() and use it in CFS also Bharata B Rao
2009-11-17 14:34 ` [RFC v4 PATCH 2/7] sched: Bandwidth initialization for fair task groups Bharata B Rao
2009-12-04 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-04 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-05 13:04 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-11-17 14:35 ` [RFC v4 PATCH 3/7] sched: Enforce hard limits by throttling Bharata B Rao
2009-12-04 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-05 13:02 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-11-17 14:35 ` [RFC v4 PATCH 4/7] sched: Unthrottle the throttled tasks Bharata B Rao
2009-11-17 14:36 ` [RFC v4 PATCH 5/7] sched: Add throttle time statistics to /proc/sched_debug Bharata B Rao
2009-11-17 14:37 ` [RFC v4 PATCH 6/7] sched: Rebalance cfs runtimes Bharata B Rao
2009-12-04 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-05 13:08 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-11-17 14:37 ` [RFC v4 PATCH 7/7] sched: Hard limits documentation Bharata B Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1259942997.17907.896.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.