From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [PATCH] binutils-2.20: remove unneeded/unwanted patches
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:24:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260393869-8231-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi khem,
In 33630af91d1027a91b43f697c86e809a770668e1 you (AFAICS) added
binutils-2.20 support, yet the hunks mentioned below were already
applied or are unneeded in that release?! How did you patch/compile
this, perhaps i'm missing some crucial part in the setup?
Thanks for clarification/fixing this up,
Bernhard
Already applied to 2.20 or unnecessary nowadays
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
---
...tils-2.16.91.0.6-objcopy-rename-errorcode.patch | 39 --------------------
.../binutils-2.20/binutils-arm-pr7093.patch | 19 ----------
.../binutils/binutils-2.20/uclibc-segfault.patch | 23 ------------
3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/binutils-2.16.91.0.6-objcopy-rename-errorcode.patch
delete mode 100644 recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/binutils-arm-pr7093.patch
delete mode 100644 recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/uclibc-segfault.patch
diff --git a/recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/binutils-2.16.91.0.6-objcopy-rename-errorcode.patch b/recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/binutils-2.16.91.0.6-objcopy-rename-errorcode.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 8df5b1f..0000000
--- a/recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/binutils-2.16.91.0.6-objcopy-rename-errorcode.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
-# strip (and objcopy) fail to set the error code if there is no
-# output file name and the rename of the stripped (or copied) file
-# fails, yet the command fails to do anything. This fixes both
-# objcopy and strip.
-#
-# modification by bero: Ported to 2.16.91.0.6
-#
-#Signed-off-by: John Bowler <jbowler@acm.org>
-#Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero@arklinux.org>
----
-# binutils/objcopy.c | 8 +++++---
-# 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-#
-Index: src/binutils/objcopy.c
-===================================================================
---- src.orig/binutils/objcopy.c 2007-08-09 13:26:03.000000000 +0100
-+++ src/binutils/objcopy.c 2007-08-09 16:36:12.000000000 +0100
-@@ -2787,8 +2787,9 @@ strip_main (int argc, char *argv[])
- if (preserve_dates)
- set_times (tmpname, &statbuf);
- if (output_file != tmpname)
-- smart_rename (tmpname, output_file ? output_file : argv[i],
-- preserve_dates);
-+ if (smart_rename (tmpname, output_file ? output_file : argv[i],
-+ preserve_dates))
-+ hold_status = 1;
- status = hold_status;
- }
- else
-@@ -3411,7 +3412,8 @@ copy_main (int argc, char *argv[])
- if (preserve_dates)
- set_times (tmpname, &statbuf);
- if (tmpname != output_filename)
-- smart_rename (tmpname, input_filename, preserve_dates);
-+ if (smart_rename (tmpname, input_filename, preserve_dates))
-+ status = 1;
- }
- else
- unlink_if_ordinary (tmpname);
diff --git a/recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/binutils-arm-pr7093.patch b/recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/binutils-arm-pr7093.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index ad4a556..0000000
--- a/recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/binutils-arm-pr7093.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
-Index: binutils/bfd/elf32-arm.c
-===================================================================
-RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-arm.c,v
-retrieving revision 1.162
-retrieving revision 1.163
-diff -u -r1.162 -r1.163
---- binutils/bfd/elf32-arm.c 23 Dec 2008 09:01:45 -0000 1.162
-+++ binutils/bfd/elf32-arm.c 23 Dec 2008 11:46:17 -0000 1.163
-@@ -4608,6 +4608,10 @@
- Elf_Internal_Shdr *hdr;
- unsigned int i, localsyms;
-
-+ /* PR 7093: Make sure that we are dealing with an arm elf binary. */
-+ if (! is_arm_elf (abfd))
-+ return;
-+
- if ((abfd->flags & DYNAMIC) != 0)
- return;
-
diff --git a/recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/uclibc-segfault.patch b/recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/uclibc-segfault.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 16a875f..0000000
--- a/recipes/binutils/binutils-2.20/uclibc-segfault.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-upstream: already committed
-
---- clean/binutils-2.19.51/bfd/elf32-arm.c 2009-05-22 12:58:44.000000000 +0100
-+++ binutils-2.19.51/bfd/elf32-arm.c 2009-06-08 21:29:49.000000000 +0100
-@@ -8960,7 +8964,7 @@ elf32_arm_fix_exidx_coverage (asection *
- struct bfd_elf_section_data *elf_sec = elf_section_data (sec);
- Elf_Internal_Shdr *hdr = &elf_sec->this_hdr;
-
-- if (hdr->sh_type != SHT_ARM_EXIDX)
-+ if (!hdr || hdr->sh_type != SHT_ARM_EXIDX)
- continue;
-
- if (elf_sec->linked_to)
---- clean/binutils-2.19.51/ld/emultempl/armelf.em 2009-05-22 12:58:45.000000000 +0100
-+++ binutils-2.19.51/ld/emultempl/armelf.em 2009-06-08 21:26:34.000000000 +0100
-@@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ gld${EMULATION_NAME}_finish (void)
- asection *out_sec = sec->output_section;
-
- if (out_sec
-+ && elf_section_data (sec)
- && elf_section_type (sec) == SHT_PROGBITS
- && (elf_section_flags (sec) & SHF_EXECINSTR) != 0
- && (sec->flags & SEC_EXCLUDE) == 0
--
1.6.5.2
next reply other threads:[~2009-12-09 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-09 21:24 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [this message]
2009-12-10 4:39 ` [PATCH] binutils-2.20: remove unneeded/unwanted patches Khem Raj
2009-12-12 11:49 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1260393869-8231-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
--to=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.