From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: on successful gss error pipe write, don't return error (try #2)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:56:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1261169812.3420.68.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091218153841.1fbd5357@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 15:38 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Well, I'd like to think that we'd always get the lower layers right, but
> I know better :). We probably ought to code defensively here and account
> for the possibility that this function could return a different error
> due to an inadvertent change in a lower function.
>
> If the "bad" error is transient then -EAGAIN would probably just paper
> over it. If it's not transient then the mount would hang. -EACCES is a
> nice hard error, but could be confused with a "real" -EACCES. We could
> BUG() in that case if we're sure it'd be a real bug...
switch (err) {
case -EACCES:
gss_msg->msg.errno = -EACCES;
break;
case -EFAULT:
case -ENOMEM:
case -EINVAL:
case -ENOSYS:
gss_msg->msg.errno = -EAGAIN;
break;
default:
BUG();
}
Yup. That looks good to me... ..and with the fixes to
gss_import_sec_context_kerberos and gss_import_sec_context, it will
actually be correct too.
BTW: get_key() returns EINVAL on error, so that does indeed need to be
supported in the above list.
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-18 16:27 [PATCH] sunrpc: on successful gss error pipe write, don't return error (try #2) Jeff Layton
2009-12-18 19:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-18 20:13 ` Jeff Layton
2009-12-18 20:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-18 20:38 ` Jeff Layton
2009-12-18 20:56 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2009-12-18 21:02 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1261169812.3420.68.camel@localhost \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.