From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751368AbZL0JAA (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:00:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751127AbZL0I77 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:59:59 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:36522 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751004AbZL0I76 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:59:58 -0500 Subject: Re: tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Lin Ming , mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel , "Zhang, Yanmin" , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker In-Reply-To: <1261902760.6201.33.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <1261739467.10685.18.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <1261902760.6201.33.camel@marge.simson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 09:59:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1261904349.15854.2.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 09:32 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Perf also isn't free, and in 33, we lost the ability to config it out, Uhm, that's a plain bug, we should be able to build a kernel without perf support, does the hw breakpoint support have an unfortunate select some place or something?