* netfilter under heavy load.
@ 2003-01-05 15:40 Mike Olivere
2003-01-06 11:24 ` ITM CS Ruslan O. Nesterov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Olivere @ 2003-01-05 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hello, I don't know if this has been brought up before but I am going to be
running netfilter under load on a fractional T-3 (12Mbps). The box will have
3 interfaces eth0 going to the Cisco 7200, eth1 (routable IPs) going to the
webfarm for DMZ zone, and then eth2 will be NATed with a private LAN IP
(192.168.1.x). I will be NATing over 200 clients and I know in the past this
could be a problem with IPCHAINS because it would either run out of memory
or start dropping connections. The webservers get about 7,000 hits a day and
they won't be NATed but will be filtered with a mix of statefule and packet
filtering rules. We have a Cisco PIX 525(which is just a Intel P600/512MB
RAM) in place right now but I would like to move to Netfilter as it will be
running on a dual P1ghz and a gig of memory. Is this possible? can Nefilter
scale to this and beyond? and is there any tweaks I should know about?
Thanks in advance.
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: netfilter under heavy load.
2003-01-05 15:40 netfilter under heavy load Mike Olivere
@ 2003-01-06 11:24 ` ITM CS Ruslan O. Nesterov
2003-01-06 23:08 ` Chris Straessle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: ITM CS Ruslan O. Nesterov @ 2003-01-06 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-admin, Mike Olivere; +Cc: netfilter
Hello Mike,
Well actually it's not a big problem, I got 100 GB a day passing
through our gateway to our clients, as far i didn't find any
problems for webservers wich are not NATed, as for clients who are
in DMZ zone i sometimes get connection error, but it's 1 in 1000
connections. I run a box with the following configuration:
Single PIII-866 MHZ
RAM: 256
NIC: 2 Intel Gigabit ethernet cards (as far as i remember).
Befor it I used a Firebox firewall and it really drived me nuts.
Due to low productivity.
Sunday, January 5, 2003, 6:40:15 PM, you wrote:
MO> Hello, I don't know if this has been brought up before but I am going to be
MO> running netfilter under load on a fractional T-3 (12Mbps). The box will have
MO> 3 interfaces eth0 going to the Cisco 7200, eth1 (routable IPs) going to the
MO> webfarm for DMZ zone, and then eth2 will be NATed with a private LAN IP
MO> (192.168.1.x). I will be NATing over 200 clients and I know in the past this
MO> could be a problem with IPCHAINS because it would either run out of memory
MO> or start dropping connections. The webservers get about 7,000 hits a day and
MO> they won't be NATed but will be filtered with a mix of statefule and packet
MO> filtering rules. We have a Cisco PIX 525(which is just a Intel P600/512MB
MO> RAM) in place right now but I would like to move to Netfilter as it will be
MO> running on a dual P1ghz and a gig of memory. Is this possible? can Nefilter
MO> scale to this and beyond? and is there any tweaks I should know about?
MO> Thanks in advance.
MO> Mike
--
Best regards,
ITM mailto:ruslan@complexsystem.ru
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: netfilter under heavy load.
2003-01-06 11:24 ` ITM CS Ruslan O. Nesterov
@ 2003-01-06 23:08 ` Chris Straessle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Straessle @ 2003-01-06 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ITM CS Ruslan O. Nesterov, Mike Olivere; +Cc: netfilter-admin, netfilter
Hello,
my company has tested several firewalls under high network load. The
importest thing is the L2 cache size from the cpu.
check this pdf, it has the information you need. :-)
http://www.terreactive.com/fcgi/fcgi/home/archive/pdf/pf-speed-test.pdf
bye,
chris
ps: sorry for my bad english... its not my language.
ITM CS Ruslan O. Nesterov wrote:
> Hello Mike,
> Well actually it's not a big problem, I got 100 GB a day passing
> through our gateway to our clients, as far i didn't find any
> problems for webservers wich are not NATed, as for clients who are
> in DMZ zone i sometimes get connection error, but it's 1 in 1000
> connections. I run a box with the following configuration:
> Single PIII-866 MHZ
> RAM: 256
> NIC: 2 Intel Gigabit ethernet cards (as far as i remember).
> Befor it I used a Firebox firewall and it really drived me nuts.
> Due to low productivity.
>
> Sunday, January 5, 2003, 6:40:15 PM, you wrote:
>
> MO> Hello, I don't know if this has been brought up before but I am going to be
> MO> running netfilter under load on a fractional T-3 (12Mbps). The box will have
> MO> 3 interfaces eth0 going to the Cisco 7200, eth1 (routable IPs) going to the
> MO> webfarm for DMZ zone, and then eth2 will be NATed with a private LAN IP
> MO> (192.168.1.x). I will be NATing over 200 clients and I know in the past this
> MO> could be a problem with IPCHAINS because it would either run out of memory
> MO> or start dropping connections. The webservers get about 7,000 hits a day and
> MO> they won't be NATed but will be filtered with a mix of statefule and packet
> MO> filtering rules. We have a Cisco PIX 525(which is just a Intel P600/512MB
> MO> RAM) in place right now but I would like to move to Netfilter as it will be
> MO> running on a dual P1ghz and a gig of memory. Is this possible? can Nefilter
> MO> scale to this and beyond? and is there any tweaks I should know about?
>
> MO> Thanks in advance.
>
> MO> Mike
>
>
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Straessle http://raptor.homeunix.net/
Alias: sacrelege email: sacrelege@swissonline.ch
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-06 23:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-05 15:40 netfilter under heavy load Mike Olivere
2003-01-06 11:24 ` ITM CS Ruslan O. Nesterov
2003-01-06 23:08 ` Chris Straessle
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.