All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: avoid huge bonus to sleepers on busy machines
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:14:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262603675.9734.36.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1262596842-17392-1-git-send-email-sjayaraman@suse.de>

On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 14:50 +0530, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
> As I understand the idea of sleeper fairness is to consider sleeping tasks
> similar to the ones on the runqueue and credit the sleepers in a way that it
> would get CPU as if it were running.
> 
> Currently, when fair sleepers are enabled, the task that was sleeping seem to
> get a bonus of cfs_rq->min_vruntime - sched_latency (in most cases). While with
> gentle fair sleepers this effect was reduced to half, there still remains a
> chance that on busy machines with more number of tasks, the sleepers might get
> a huge undue bonus.

There is no bonus.  Sleepers simply get to keep some of their lag, but
any lag beyond sched_latency is trashed in the interest of reasonable
latency for non-sleepers as the sleeper preempts and tries to catch up.

	-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-04 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-04  9:20 [RFC][PATCH] sched: avoid huge bonus to sleepers on busy machines Suresh Jayaraman
2010-01-04 11:14 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2010-01-04 12:02   ` Suresh Jayaraman
2010-01-04 12:30     ` Mike Galbraith
2010-01-04 12:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-04 12:49         ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1262603675.9734.36.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sjayaraman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.