From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
To: Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>
Cc: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB: serial: kfifo_len locking
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:25:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262690734.22009.3.camel@wall-e> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100105111401.GB10442@localhost>
Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2010, 12:14 +0100 schrieb Johan Hovold:
> > >
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/patches.git;a=blob;f=usb/usb-serial-mct_usb232-add-drain-on-close.patch;h=c464f1a82e93df0dd41762a8cb33b0b22e90cdd7;hb=1ea72e7c40b239c6b6f88a4993196be66fc3d892
> > >
> > > 38 --- a/drivers/usb/serial/generic.c
> > > 39 +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/generic.c
> > > 40 @@ -369,8 +369,11 @@ int usb_serial_generic_write_room(struct
> > > 41 room = port->bulk_out_size *
> > > 42 (serial->type->max_in_flight_urbs -
> > > 43 port->urbs_in_flight);
> > > 44 - } else if (serial->num_bulk_out)
> > > 45 + } else if (serial->num_bulk_out) {
> > > 46 + /* This overcounts badly, but is good enough for drain wait. */
> > > 47 room = kfifo_avail(&port->write_fifo);
> > > 48 + room += port->write_urb_busy * port->bulk_out_size;
> > > 49 + }
> > > 50 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
> > > 51
> > > 52 dbg("%s - returns %d", __func__, room);
> > >
> > >
> > > Which does not make any sense at all. Bad merge? What do you say Greg?
> > >
> >
> > I don't know where is your problem? This are two different functions
> > usb_serial_generic_write_room() and usb_serial_generic_chars_in_buffer()
>
> Exactly my point.
>
> The drain patch needed to modify chars_in_buffer, but the patch in Greg's
> tree modifies write_room instead (which does not make sense and was
> neither part of the submitted patch).
>
Sorry, but i am not sure if i the right address about your complains.
The only thing i have done in the usb serial driver is the port to the
new kfifo API. This is the original patch i had posted:
diff -u -N -r -p old/drivers/usb/serial/generic.c new/drivers/usb/serial/generic.c
--- old/drivers/usb/serial/generic.c 2009-12-23 08:54:06.966476248 +0100
+++ new/drivers/usb/serial/generic.c 2009-12-23 09:06:25.778474708 +0100
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static int usb_serial_generic_write_star
if (port->write_urb_busy)
start_io = false;
else {
- start_io = (kfifo_len(port->write_fifo) != 0);
+ start_io = (kfifo_len(&port->write_fifo) != 0);
port->write_urb_busy = start_io;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static int usb_serial_generic_write_star
return 0;
data = port->write_urb->transfer_buffer;
- count = kfifo_out_locked(port->write_fifo, data, port->bulk_out_size, &port->lock);
+ count = kfifo_out_locked(&port->write_fifo, data, port->bulk_out_size, &port->lock);
usb_serial_debug_data(debug, &port->dev, __func__, count, data);
/* set up our urb */
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ int usb_serial_generic_write(struct tty_
return usb_serial_multi_urb_write(tty, port,
buf, count);
- count = kfifo_in_locked(port->write_fifo, buf, count, &port->lock);
+ count = kfifo_in_locked(&port->write_fifo, buf, count, &port->lock);
result = usb_serial_generic_write_start(port);
if (result >= 0)
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ int usb_serial_generic_write_room(struct
(serial->type->max_in_flight_urbs -
port->urbs_in_flight);
} else if (serial->num_bulk_out)
- room = port->write_fifo->size - kfifo_len(port->write_fifo);
+ room = kfifo_avail(&port->write_fifo);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
dbg("%s - returns %d", __func__, room);
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ int usb_serial_generic_chars_in_buffer(s
chars = port->tx_bytes_flight;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
} else if (serial->num_bulk_out)
- chars = kfifo_len(port->write_fifo);
+ chars = kfifo_len(&port->write_fifo);
dbg("%s - returns %d", __func__, chars);
return chars;
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ void usb_serial_generic_write_bulk_callb
if (status) {
dbg("%s - nonzero multi-urb write bulk status "
"received: %d", __func__, status);
- kfifo_reset(port->write_fifo);
+ kfifo_reset_out(&port->write_fifo);
} else
usb_serial_generic_write_start(port);
}
diff -u -N -r -p old/drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c new/drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c
--- old/drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c 2009-12-23 08:54:23.204476351 +0100
+++ new/drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c 2009-12-23 09:06:39.664475312 +0100
@@ -595,8 +595,7 @@ static void port_release(struct device *
usb_free_urb(port->write_urb);
usb_free_urb(port->interrupt_in_urb);
usb_free_urb(port->interrupt_out_urb);
- if (!IS_ERR(port->write_fifo) && port->write_fifo)
- kfifo_free(port->write_fifo);
+ kfifo_free(&port->write_fifo);
kfree(port->bulk_in_buffer);
kfree(port->bulk_out_buffer);
kfree(port->interrupt_in_buffer);
@@ -939,7 +938,7 @@ int usb_serial_probe(struct usb_interfac
dev_err(&interface->dev, "No free urbs available\n");
goto probe_error;
}
- if (kfifo_alloc(port->write_fifo, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL))
+ if (kfifo_alloc(&port->write_fifo, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL))
goto probe_error;
buffer_size = le16_to_cpu(endpoint->wMaxPacketSize);
port->bulk_out_size = buffer_size;
diff -u -N -r -p old/include/linux/usb/serial.h new/include/linux/usb/serial.h
--- old/include/linux/usb/serial.h 2009-12-23 08:54:34.368476110 +0100
+++ new/include/linux/usb/serial.h 2009-12-23 09:06:32.870725683 +0100
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/kref.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/sysrq.h>
+#include <linux/kfifo.h>
#define SERIAL_TTY_MAJOR 188 /* Nice legal number now */
#define SERIAL_TTY_MINORS 254 /* loads of devices :) */
@@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ struct usb_serial_port {
unsigned char *bulk_out_buffer;
int bulk_out_size;
struct urb *write_urb;
- struct kfifo *write_fifo;
+ struct kfifo write_fifo;
int write_urb_busy;
__u8 bulk_out_endpointAddress;
As you can see i didn't changed noting about this drain thing.
Stefani
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-05 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-04 17:43 USB: serial: kfifo_len locking Johan Hovold
2010-01-04 19:20 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-01-05 7:43 ` Pete Zaitcev
2010-01-05 7:51 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-01-05 11:04 ` Johan Hovold
2010-01-05 11:09 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-01-05 11:14 ` Johan Hovold
2010-01-05 11:25 ` Stefani Seibold [this message]
2010-01-05 11:35 ` Johan Hovold
2010-01-05 12:01 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-01-05 12:10 ` Johan Hovold
2010-01-05 13:30 ` [tip:urgent] fix USB serial fix " Stefani Seibold
2010-01-05 14:32 ` Greg KH
2010-01-05 13:38 ` [tip:urgent] fix kfifo_out_locked race bug Stefani Seibold
2010-01-08 23:18 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-05 17:00 ` USB: serial: kfifo_len locking Pete Zaitcev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1262690734.22009.3.camel@wall-e \
--to=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jhovold@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.