From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from static.26.116.47.78.clients.your-server.de ([78.47.116.26] helo=drlauer-research.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVQ80-0005lt-NL for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:52:51 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.105] (e180144242.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.144.242]) by drlauer-research.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248DF584185 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:41:59 +0100 (CET) From: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <1263426466.457.286.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <1263427123.15954.6.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Organization: Vanille-Media Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:52:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1263477134.22868.65.camel@andromeda> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.26 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mickey@vanille-media.de X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: RFC: Sane default for SPLASH X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:52:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 10:14 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: > NAK, the needless SPLASH -> BOOTSPLASH will create too much work for > people to catch up to, and it messes up the docs on the subject. Could you expand on that reason? I find the patch quite a useful refactoring. If we don't allow patches like this going in, we're doomed into living with misnomers forever -- and we all know that there are quite a few in OE metadata. Cheers, -- :M: