All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
To: George Kadianakis <desnacked@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, james.smart@emulex.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] SCSI: lpfc, restore MSI-X/MSI support
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:47:32 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263754052.2802.2.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r5pta66n.fsf@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 02:20 +0200, George Kadianakis wrote:
> From: George Kadianakis <desnacked {bomb} gmail {point} com>
> 
> A Gentoo bug report [1] showed that as of 2.6.31 lpfc only uses INTx interrupts.
> This patch restores lpfc's ability to support MSI-X/MSI interrupts that the 
> "Addition of SLI4 Interface - Base Support" patch [2] broke.
> It reestablishes MSI-X as the default interrupt method and in case MSI-X is not 
> supported lpfc_sli{4,}_enable_intr fallbacks to MSI and then to INTx.
> 
> [1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296319
> [2]: commit da0436e915a5c17ee79e72c1bf978a4ebb1cbf4d

So now I have an ack for this, I need an applyable patch.

> Signed-off-by:  George Kadianakis <desnacked {cat} gmail {dog} com>

This needs to be a proper email

>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
> index e1a30a1..936ecaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
> @@ -2890,12 +2890,12 @@ LPFC_ATTR_RW(poll_tmo, 10, 1, 255,
>  /*
>  # lpfc_use_msi: Use MSI (Message Signaled Interrupts) in systems that
>  # 				 support this feature
> -#       0  = MSI disabled (default)
> +#       0  = MSI disabled
>  #       1  = MSI enabled
> -#       2  = MSI-X enabled
> +#       2  = MSI-X enabled (default)
>  # Value range is [0,2]. Default value is 0.
>  */
> -LPFC_ATTR_R(use_msi, 0, 0, 2, "Use Message Signaled Interrupts (1) or "
> +LPFC_ATTR_R(use_msi, 2, 0, 2, "Use Message Signaled Interrupts (1) or "
>  					      "MSI-X (2), if possible");
>  
>  /*

And for some reason there are extra tabs in the above lines which cause
patch to reject.

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-17 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-14  0:20 [PATCH 1/1] SCSI: lpfc, restore MSI-X/MSI support George Kadianakis
2010-01-14 17:03 ` James Smart
2010-01-14 17:26   ` George Kadianakis
2010-01-14 22:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-17 18:47 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2010-01-17 19:19   ` George Kadianakis
2010-01-18 14:48     ` Rolf Eike Beer
2010-01-18 18:06       ` George Kadianakis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1263754052.2802.2.camel@mulgrave.site \
    --to=james.bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=desnacked@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.