From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754638Ab0ATVHH (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:07:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754559Ab0ATVHF (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:07:05 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:53411 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754011Ab0ATVHC (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:07:02 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] sched: Make Priority Inheritance POSIX compliant From: Peter Zijlstra To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Carsten Emde , Mathias Weber In-Reply-To: <20100120171231.922420383@linutronix.de> References: <20100120171231.922420383@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:06:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1264021607.4283.1118.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 20:58 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > The current PI implementation violates POSIX scheduling semantics when > a thread is deboosted. The following patch series adresses this. > > Thanks and Kudos go to Mathias Weber and Carsten Emde for analysis, > test cases and initial workaround patches. These look fine to me, Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra