From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"j@w1.fi" <j@w1.fi>, Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] mac80211: tell driver when dtim change detected
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:22:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264206170.7208.8.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e891001221623v477b9fady32237c1a3aededda@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 16:23 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Guy, Wey-Yi <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 15:44 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Johannes Berg
> >> <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 11:20 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > Previously, we would switch the channel completely to the new operating
> >> >> > channel before even probing the AP. That way, we would virtually always
> >> >> > receive a beacon from the new AP between the time we started the
> >> >> > association process (probe,auth,assoc) and configuring the driver.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Now with the new changes that use the off-channel work, we may return to
> >> >> > the old "operating" channel, which may be no particular channel, between
> >> >> > all these steps. Thus, if there's no beacon between any of probe
> >> >> > request/response, auth "request"/"response", assoc request/response, we
> >> >> > never get one, and this situation happens.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I see two solutions, apart from this special-case patch fixing
> >> >> >
> >> >> > First, we could go back to the original behaviour if we have just one
> >> >> > virtual interface. But that still leaves us with the race, we might do
> >> >> > all three frame exchanges within a beacon interval and still miss the
> >> >> > beacon, we just tend to not do that and get a beacon.
> >> >>
> >> >> Curious, what symptoms were seen when the dtim was not propagated
> >> >> prior to association, did the STA just not wake up for the right dtim
> >> >> interval when in PS mode?
> >> >
> >> > Yes, I don't really know exactly what happens,
> >>
> >> OK -- Wey, can you elaborate a little as to how you found this and
> >> what you were seeing? Does the device not go into PS mode at all?
> >
> > We are doing Power consumption test with different DTIM value, the test
> > is based on test scripts, so we disable the NetworkManager to make sure
> > we can control which AP we need to associated with. During the test, we
> > notice when AP change it DTIM value, a lot time STA will used the old
> > DTIM value in Power Save mode which cause problem.
>
> Ah I see. What if there was no old dtim value before?
I am not sure, I believe the default is "1", but I might be wrong
>
> > We believe the correct fix is mac80211 should wait for both probe
> > response and beacon arrived before start the association process.
> >
> > Hope this explain what we found.
>
> Indeed, thanks a lot.
>
> Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-23 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 21:39 [PATCH v3 1/1] mac80211: tell driver when dtim change detected wey-yi.w.guy
2010-01-22 19:03 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-22 19:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-22 19:46 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-22 23:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-22 23:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-23 0:11 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-01-23 0:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-23 0:22 ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
2010-01-23 12:46 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-25 18:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-25 18:33 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-25 19:55 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-25 20:06 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-26 8:41 ` Kalle Valo
2010-01-25 18:32 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-01-25 18:36 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-25 18:38 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-23 8:23 ` Kalle Valo
2010-01-25 18:35 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-01-25 20:11 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-25 20:46 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1264206170.7208.8.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kalle.valo@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.