From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
To: Yolkfull Chow <yzhou@redhat.com>
Cc: autotest@test.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Autotest PATCH] KVM-test: Add a subtest 'qemu_img'
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:14:44 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264684484.2416.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100128093726.GB2356@aFu.nay.redhat.com>
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:37 +0800, Yolkfull Chow wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 03:11:34PM -0200, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > That said, I was wondering if we could consolidate all qemu-img tests to
> > a single execution, instead of splitting it to several variants. We
> > could keep a failure record, execute all tests and fail the entire test
> > if any of them failed. It's not like terribly important, but it seems
> > more logical to group all qemu-img subcommands testing under a single
> > test.
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> After considering above suggestion about merging all qemu-img tests into single test,
> I did decision that keep current method due to reason that:
> 1) it's convenient to maintain so many parameters of each test variant.
> 2) current method does not affect global results since even if one subtest of 'qemu-img' failes,
> it will nor block following subtests (we can still get whole test results)
> 3) it's possible for user to run single subtest of qemu-img, say only test 'rebase' subcommand
>
> As you also said this is not terribly important, let's keep it going. What's your opinion?
Ok, I am fine with it!
Lucas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-28 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-26 3:25 [Autotest PATCH] KVM-test: Add a subtest 'qemu_img' Yolkfull Chow
2010-01-26 17:11 ` [Autotest] " Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-01-27 9:41 ` Yolkfull Chow
2010-01-27 11:13 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-01-28 9:37 ` [Autotest] " Yolkfull Chow
2010-01-28 13:14 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues [this message]
[not found] <2023444877.247901264595238261.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-01-27 12:37 ` Michael Goldish
2010-01-28 3:07 ` Yolkfull Chow
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-29 7:00 Yolkfull Chow
2010-01-29 7:20 ` Yolkfull Chow
2010-03-17 13:38 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1264684484.2416.0.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lmr@redhat.com \
--cc=autotest@test.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yzhou@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.