From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni6lm-0007qW-6c for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:50:21 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1IDlbAR016478 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:47:37 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 16364-02 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:47:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1IDlMB6016472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:47:24 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:47:20 +0000 Message-ID: <1266500840.6436.925.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 93.97.173.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpurdie@rpsys.net X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: {RFC] console-image.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:50:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 13:38 +0100, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Koen Kooi wrote: > > It hasn't suddenly appeared, and furthermore console-image is widely > > used enough to label it 'core' > > nonsense, another of your ad-hoc rules > > BTW, why have you not replied to Mickey? What he quotes apparently was > made an official rule (although the doc team was never asked to include > it in the wiki AFAICT). > > It's always the same pattern with you. At least you're consistent in > your inconsistency. > > > And non-angstrom people created angstrom-named new recipes without any > > approval from angstrom developers is just plain rude. > > you're a nut case, plain and simple. Do you think this is really helping your case here? I hope we can agree that no, personal insults are not going to help. I don't care who started it, I don't care who said what first and this is not a kindergarten, even if some people want to act like it is. We have a problem, that much is clear. The TSC and the e.V. itself are looking at it. Rightly or wrongly we have people in different timezones and this is going to take time. I'm going to ask that those groups be given the time and space to do their jobs. Until they've done that can everyone please try and calm down before this blows out of all proportion. Cheers, Richard