From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from static.26.116.47.78.clients.your-server.de ([78.47.116.26] helo=drlauer-research.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlT2V-00005O-RG for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:13:29 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (e180137157.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.137.157]) by drlauer-research.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2611584160 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:05:44 +0100 (CET) From: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <201002271904.22479.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> <201002271945.18454.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> Organization: Vanille-Media Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:11:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1267301465.3263.11.camel@andromeda> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.26 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mickey@vanille-media.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] recipes/images/${distro} X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:13:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Samstag, den 27.02.2010, 20:01 +0100 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > 2010/2/27 Marcin Juszkiewicz : > > Dnia sobota, 27 lutego 2010 o 19:40:32 Frans Meulenbroeks napisa=C5=82= (a): > > > >> I just wanted to suggest a more sensible and clear naming scheme and > >> clean up a little bit, but apparently this is not appreciated :-( > > > >> (and yes, I also think it makes sense to remove old orphaned unused > >> 5-year-old recipes, but guess I'm alone here too). > > > > The problem is that we do not know who uses them. We can remove ones = which no > > one is using or alter them in any way - thats why we are using SCM so= users > > can revert any change. > > > >> Guess I'd better not propose to remove some of those 26 (yes, > >> twenty-six!) glib recipes (or 8 abiword recipes ) > > > > Oh cleanups... Too much things to get cleaned, reorganized etc :( > > > Yes and this was a small proposal towards it, but I feel it is not > really appreciated, so I suggest to forget about it. > I'll just move on to activities that I feel are more appreciated. Fwiw, I think it's a good idea and would support that. We have a very conservative majority in OE though ;) --=20 :M: