From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from static.26.116.47.78.clients.your-server.de ([78.47.116.26] helo=drlauer-research.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlqpX-0004RK-Tm for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:37:40 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (e180134197.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.134.197]) by drlauer-research.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A284C584132 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:30:01 +0100 (CET) From: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Vanille-Media Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:35:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1267392928.13054.1.camel@andromeda> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.26 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mickey@vanille-media.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC} glib-2.0 cleanup X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:37:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Sonntag, den 28.02.2010, 20:39 +0100 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > We have 26 glib-2.0 recipes (and 8 native ones). (see ls below) > Only a few versions are used (see also the grep below) > > for glib-2.0: > "2.12.12" > "2.16.4" > "2.18.3" > "2.20.3" > "2.22.1" > "2.22.4" > "2.6.4" > "2.8.6" > > for glib-2.0-native: > "2.16.1" > "2.18.0" > "2.22.1" > "2.22.4" > > Both include the last two versions > Proposal is to remove all versions that are not used. > > How do people feel about this? Sounds good to me, althoug I'd recommend not removing them but just moving them out of sight, i.e. in an 'old' folder. That way we could please both the lets-keep-everything-no-matter-how-rotten and also the lets-strive-for-few-high-quality recipes. Cheers, -- :M: