From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Fix sched_clock_cpu for systems with unsynchronized TSC
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:58:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1267466280.16916.927.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100301174815.GC8224@sgi.com>
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 09:48 -0800, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> On UV systems, the TSC is not synchronized across blades. The
> sched_clock_cpu() function is returning values that can go backwards
> (I've seen as much as 8 seconds) when switching between cpus.
>
> As each cpu comes up, early_init_intel() will currently set the
> sched_clock_stable flag true. When mark_tsc_unstable() runs, it clears
> the flag, but this only occurs once (the first time a cpu comes up whose
> TSC is not synchronized with cpu 0). After this, early_init_intel() will
> set the flag again as the next cpu comes up.
>
> Only set sched_clock_stable if tsc has not been marked unstable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
>
> ---
>
> Only affects x86 arch.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(s
> if (c->x86_power & (1 << 8)) {
> set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
> set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
> - sched_clock_stable = 1;
> + if (!check_tsc_unstable())
> + sched_clock_stable = 1;
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-01 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-01 17:48 [PATCH v2] x86: Fix sched_clock_cpu for systems with unsynchronized TSC Dimitri Sivanich
2010-03-01 17:58 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh [this message]
2010-03-02 12:39 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1267466280.16916.927.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.