From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752743Ab0CBLlY (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:41:24 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:33125 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752693Ab0CBLlW (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:41:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: add sampling period randomization support From: Peter Zijlstra To: Robert Richter Cc: eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net, eranian@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20100302105314.GF13205@erda.amd.com> References: <1267510029-19750-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> <20100302105314.GF13205@erda.amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:41:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1267530078.25158.41.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 11:53 +0100, Robert Richter wrote: > > Only adding the random value will lead to longer sample periods on > average. To compensate this you could calculate something like: > > event->hw.sample_period = event->attr.sample_period + (new_seed & mask) - (mask >> 1); Or cheat and do something like: sample_period ^= (new_seed & mask);