From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH]xfrm: fix perpetual bundles Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:10:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1267535426.21749.24.camel@bigi> References: <1267017564.3973.790.camel@bigi> <20100302112754.GA1513@gondor.apana.org.au> <1267531905.21749.21.camel@bigi> <20100302125156.GA2420@gondor.apana.org.au> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kaber@trash.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, nakam@linux-ipv6.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Steffen Klassert To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:51210 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753123Ab0CBNKf (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:10:35 -0500 Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so75674vws.19 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:10:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100302125156.GA2420@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 20:51 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > Heh, you've just discovered a bug that I carefully planted back > in 2007, while merging the v4/v6 policy code :) ;-> I am suprised it hasnt been noticed sooner given it accumulates memory on a per-packet basis. > It is a clear merging error, where *fl became rt->fl which is > totally different. So please try this patch: > Looks like it would work. I dont have time right now - but will by either tonight or tomorrow evening. Steffen, if you have time - please go ahead and try it out as well. cheers, jamal