From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dwalker@codeaurora.org (Daniel Walker)
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:38:35 -0800
Subject: board/device file names, and machine names
In-Reply-To: <20100303084244.GD29715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1267565398.8759.77.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
	<20100302235137.GC29715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<1267576760.8759.164.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
	<20100303084244.GD29715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <1267627115.1896.16.camel@m0nster>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 08:42 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> Stick with Google's existing naming for files and interally within files.
> Put a comment in the files giving all the names.  Use the common name in
> the Kconfig text, and either put the internal names in the help text or
> in brackets in the main option text.
> 
> 
> Don't like it?  I'm sure there's always going to be someone who doesn't
> like whatever is decided upon, so get over it.  The important thing is
> that the decision is made, and that there's no further dithering over
> this issue.

Ok .. Thanks for the comments Russell.

Daniel