From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: eranian@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, robert.richter@amd.com, davem@davemloft.net,
perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net, eranian@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix X86 bogus counts when multiplexing
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:32:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268296361.5279.901.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268288259-4011-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 22:17 -0800, eranian@google.com wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug in 2.6.33 X86 event scheduling whereby
> all counts are bogus as soon as events need to be multiplexed
> because the PMU is overcommitted.
>
> The code in hw_perf_enable() was causing multiplexed events
> to accumulate collected counts twice causing bogus results.
>
> This is demonstrated on AMD Barcelona with the example
> below. First run, no conflict, you obtain the actual counts.
> Second run, PMU overcommitted, multiplexing, all events are
> over-counted. Third run, patch applied, you obtain the correct
> count through scaling.
>
I'm a bit puzzled by this one, if we, during scheduling move an event
from idx 1 to idx 2, we need to stop it on 1 and start if on 2,
otherwise we do not properly transfer its count, right?
With the below patch it does no such thing.
I did fix some funnies I observed with hw_perf_enable() while doing the
PEBS stuff, and -tip does it wrong differently from what you illustrate,
so while there defenately is something to fix, I doubt the below is
correct.
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> --
> perf_event.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index 97cddbf..ef5d63f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -818,8 +818,6 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
> match_prev_assignment(hwc, cpuc, i))
> continue;
>
> - x86_pmu_stop(event);
> -
> hwc->idx = -1;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 6:17 [PATCH] perf_events: fix X86 bogus counts when multiplexing eranian
2010-03-11 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-03-11 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-11 14:41 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Fix hw_perf_enable() event assignment tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268296361.5279.901.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.