From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763291AbYESNqs (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 09:46:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755029AbYESNqj (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 09:46:39 -0400 Received: from vena.lwn.net ([206.168.112.25]:60390 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754841AbYESNqi (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 09:46:38 -0400 To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Alan Cox , Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] Char dev BKL pushdown v2 From: corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 May 2008 14:03:01 +1000." <20080519140301.ae7d4de6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 07:46:38 -0600 Message-ID: <12693.1211204798@vena.lwn.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I haven't been following this too closely, so how much of this stuff has > been posted/review/tested? This is the second posting (some of the changesets are new this time around). It all builds and runs for me, but a lot of this work affects some of the oldest, most cobweb-filled code around, and I sure don't have that hardware. Some others have looked at, but I'm not sure how deeply. The basic concept of this work is straightforward, so I have good reason to hope I've not done anything really stupid. jon