All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, h.mitake@gmail.com,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/11] lock monitor: Separate features related to lock
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:32:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269358360.5109.88.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BA4860C.3050001@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>

On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 17:23 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> In lockdep, held_locks of task_struct are accessed this arithmetical way
>                 prev = curr->held_locks + i;
> Of course this is valid way, but I feel it is more simple and natural way
>                 prev = curr->held_locks[i];
> 

The latter is a type mis-match, an equivalent expression would be:
   &curr->held_locks[i];

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-23 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-14 10:38 [PATCH RFC 00/11] lock monitor: Separate features related to lock Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] lock monitor: New subsystem for lock event hooking Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] Adopt lockdep to lock monitor Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] Adopt spinlock " Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] Adopt rwlock " Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] Adopt arch dependent rwsem " Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] Adopt rwsem of x86 " Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 07/11] Adopt the way of initializing semaphore " Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] Adopt mutex " Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] Adopt rcu_read_lock() " Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] Adopt kernel/sched.c " Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 10:38 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] Very dirty temporal solution for testing " Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-14 18:13 ` [PATCH RFC 00/11] lock monitor: Separate features related to lock Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-17  1:32   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-17  7:30     ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-17 15:39       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-18  5:49         ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-18 20:30           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-20  5:51             ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-23 15:45         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-17  9:52     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-17 13:59       ` Jason Baron
2010-03-18  5:59       ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-18 21:16         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-19  1:08           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-19  1:23             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-19  1:36               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-19  2:27                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-19  2:40                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-19  3:06                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-19 12:56                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-19 16:00                         ` Jason Baron
2010-03-20  4:51                           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-20  4:46                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-20  5:56           ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-20  8:23             ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-21  9:49               ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-23 15:32               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-04-04  7:56                 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-17  1:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-17  7:33   ` Hitoshi Mitake
2010-03-17  9:50     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1269358360.5109.88.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=h.mitake@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.