From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.reciva.com ([82.71.203.194] helo=crown.reciva.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwayG-0002F8-6v for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:55:05 +0200 Received: from host86-159-44-123.range86-159.btcentralplus.com ([86.159.44.123] helo=lurch.internal.reciva.com) by crown.reciva.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwav7-0004Vi-IO for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:51:50 +0100 Received: from mill.internal.reciva.com ([192.168.106.87] ident=pb) by lurch.internal.reciva.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwav6-0003oD-CM for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:51:48 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <1269730499.4033.176.camel@mattotaupa> <1269797481.8018.80.camel@mattotaupa> <1269949824.4103.38.camel@mattotaupa> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:51:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1269953505.14554.2.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.71.203.194 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philb@gnu.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] autotool.bbclass: Remove `EXTRA_AUTORECONF = "--exclude=autopoint"`. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:55:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 14:38 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > I wonder if we only should run autopoint if there are AM_GNU_GETTEXT* > macros in configure.{in,ac}, or does autopoint take care of that > automagically? Autoreconf has some (limited) logic to figure out whether autopoint is needed. I think that ought to be sufficient. p.