From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxOtD-0007Rg-RE for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:13:12 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o31I9r2A024631; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:09:53 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24606-01; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:09:49 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o31I9lk7024625 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:09:47 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <1270140349.6277.110.camel@trini-m4400> References: <1270135981.4993.128.camel@rex> <1270136509.6277.97.camel@trini-m4400> <1270136609.6277.98.camel@trini-m4400> <1270138027.4993.139.camel@rex> <1270140349.6277.110.camel@trini-m4400> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:09:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1270145385.4993.155.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 93.97.173.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpurdie@rpsys.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC, TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Cc: "Lock, Joshua" Subject: Re: Request for branch merge X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:13:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:45 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > There's two uglies here. Ugly one, above. Quoting isn't nice to read > and gdb/gcc/binutils are special. It does however, work from the > get-go. And the only cases it doesn't get right, right off the bat are > some perl (and possibly python) module cases where we aren't giving the > right relative path there, but we can always figure it out and fix that > up per recipe. Ugly two, the chrpath way. Depends on having a big > enough RPATH in the initial binary to patch over. Doesn't work if the > RPATH isn't long enough as you say, which is why you can't do it on > -cross. I've done the maths and it will always work within the sysroots/staging directory as there is always enough length available. Since we want rid of /cross/ for various reasons anyway I don't think this is a reason against this approach. Cheers, Richard