From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxOvN-0007XT-1d for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:15:25 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o31IC8Xr024665 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:12:08 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24606-02 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:12:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o31IC2mO024659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:12:02 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <1270140902.6277.123.camel@trini-m4400> References: <1270137923.6277.101.camel@trini-m4400> <1270139665.4993.152.camel@rex> <1270140902.6277.123.camel@trini-m4400> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:12:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1270145520.4993.157.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 93.97.173.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpurdie@rpsys.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC, TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [oe-commits] Joshua Lock : packaged-staging: post-process non-binary files to fix paths packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:15:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:55 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 17:34 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > There's a lot more than just .la files that get these paths wrong. If > > > you use the scan_cmd you set on native/etc for everything you can fix > > > them all up. > > > > It scans everything for -native packages and just .la files for target > > packages. I'd argue that for target packages we're better off fixing the > > problems at source since the real target packages are probably also > > bust? > > Ah, hmm. It's possibly just the .la files on the target (which some of > us would like to see die and I can't argue against), I hadn't really > bothered to differentiate (and I don't think it's a noticeable time > diff). Less logic also brings it closer to working for relocation of > everything. But at the cost our target packages are most likely buggy. We accept the .la files are a problem and there is a solution (libtool sysroot support) but we're not there yet. I'd like to see the other problems addressed, not brushed under the carpet so to speak. You can trivially make this work on all files in your local.conf/distro.conf anyway. I'd not like to see that the default. Cheers, Richard