From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxP0S-0007ih-8H for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:20:40 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o31IHNLp024739 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:17:23 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24658-02 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:17:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o31IHJcI024733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:17:19 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <1270135981.4993.128.camel@rex> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:17:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1270145837.4993.159.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 93.97.173.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpurdie@rpsys.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC, TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Request for branch merge X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:20:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:55 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > On 01-04-10 17:33, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > I could post the patches individually and get Acked lines for each one > > but I'm hoping to avoid that and get permission to merge the branch > > directly. We have talked about most of these things in one form or > > another. > > I don't think this will get serious review people other than Tom, Khem > and Chris, so if they don't have huge objections, merge it and we'll > deal with the fallout together if needed. > > And you just had to do this to fill the TSC meeting agenda for tonight, > right? :p I did chuckle when I realised the timing :) Cheers, Richard