All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@efficios.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Brendan Gregg <bgregg@netflix.com>
Cc: diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [diamon-discuss] Diamon Meeting on Tuesday February 9th, 2016, at 11h EDT (15h UTC)
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:44:35 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270496426.1705.1455803075845.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160218044147.GG3408@sinkpad>

Adding Alexei and Brendan in CC, they will likely be interested
in the eBPF discussion.

Thanks,

Mathieu

----- On Feb 17, 2016, at 11:41 PM, Julien Desfossez jdesfossez@efficios.com wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We are currently setting up a place on the diamon website so we can
> upload the slides, I will send the link soon.
> 
> Regarding the mainlining, we intend to push this projet upstream. Before
> that, we are working on more measurements/benchmarks, stability testing
> and usability improvements.
> 
> Also, one things that we would like to investigate before sending the
> patches is the possibility of using eBPF/bcc to handle the probes while
> keeping the latency-tracker as the backend to keep the state and all the
> more advanced interactions with the kernel. That way, we could combine
> the flexibility/safety of eBPF and the efficiency of the
> latency-tracker.
> 
> Thanks for your feedback, I will keep this list updated of the progress
> we make on that front.
> 
> Julien
> 
> On 14-Feb-2016 11:37:44 AM, Al Grant wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have read the blog and this looks a very useful technique but unfortunately I
>> couldn't make the call.  Are slides/minutes available?
>> 
>> My main question is not actually technical - it's about the prospects for
>> getting
>> this into mainline Linux.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Al
>> 
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: diamon-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org [mailto:diamon-
>> > discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Julien Desfossez
>> > Sent: 08 February 2016 19:14
>> > To: Mathieu Desnoyers
>> > Cc: diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> > Subject: Re: [diamon-discuss] Diamon Meeting on Tuesday February 9th, 2016,
>> > at 11h EDT (15h UTC)
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Here is the information for tomorrow's call:
>> > February 9th, 2016, at 11h EDT (15h UTC)
>> >
>> > Conference: 415-906-5657 PIN: 88326
>> > URL for the screen sharing: www.uberconference.com/mdolan
>> >
>> > Local International phone numbers are available at:
>> > https://www.uberconference.com/international
>> >
>> > Please note anyone dialing using the international numbers need to dial the
>> > local international number for the country they are in, then enter the US
>> > conference number (4159065657), and then enter the PIN (88326).
>> >
>> > Julien
>> >
>> > On 28-Jan-2016 08:08:45 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Following the blog post published two weeks ago [1], we would like to
>> > > propose organizing a phone meeting with all interested members of this
>> > > workgroup on February 9th to gather feedback and ideas for improvement
>> > > on the subject of measuring and detecting high response time.
>> > >
>> > > At EfficiOS, we have developed a kernel module for monitoring at
>> > > run-time the delay between the moment the kernel starts processing an
>> > > interrupt
>> > > (do_IRQ) and the moment the target task gets scheduled in or has
>> > > finished processing the data.
>> > >
>> > > When a high latency is detected, it emits a tracepoint event and can
>> > > wakeup a user-space script to take arbitrary actions as soon as
>> > > possible.
>> > >
>> > > The main intent is to provide an entry point in a kernel trace. After
>> > > that, everyone has their own methodology to process the trace. The
>> > > blog post illustrates what we can do with LTTng as an example but the
>> > > detection and triggers are not coupled with any tracer.
>> > >
>> > > The proposed agenda is a discussion around these points:
>> > > - presentation of the scope of the problem
>> > > - limitation of the current tools
>> > > - overview of the latency_tracker module applied for this use-case
>> > > -- current state
>> > > -- use-cases
>> > > -- future plans
>> > > - from the audience: comments, ideas, other approaches, etc.
>> > >
>> > > If you have other points you would like to discuss around this
>> > > subject, please let me know and I will add them.
>> > >
>> > > Also, if you wish to attend but can't make it at the proposed date and
>> > > time, let us know.
>> > >
>> > > The details for the conference call will be sent soon.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Julien & Mathieu
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://lttng.org/blog/2016/01/06/monitoring-realtime-latencies/
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Mathieu Desnoyers
>> > > EfficiOS Inc.
>> > > http://www.efficios.com
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > diamon-discuss mailing list
>> > diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/diamon-discuss
>> 
>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
>> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
>> please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any
>> other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any
>> medium. Thank you.

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-18 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-28 20:08 [diamon-discuss] Diamon Meeting on Tuesday February 9th, 2016, at 11h EDT (15h UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-02-04  9:31 ` Oberhuber, Martin
2016-02-08 19:00   ` Julien Desfossez
2016-02-16 21:15   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-02-16 21:22     ` Julien Desfossez
2016-02-16 21:37       ` Michael Dolan
2016-02-08 19:13 ` Julien Desfossez
2016-02-09 16:02   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-02-14 11:37   ` Al Grant
2016-02-18  4:41     ` Julien Desfossez
2016-02-18 13:44       ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-18 19:40 Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1270496426.1705.1455803075845.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bgregg@netflix.com \
    --cc=diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jdesfossez@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.