From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 3a.49.1343.static.theplanet.com ([67.19.73.58] helo=pug.o-hand.com ident=postfix) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz9wA-0006wH-2J for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:39:31 +0200 Received: from [10.250.128.186] (unknown [158.43.2.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pug.o-hand.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072A312EC32F for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:00:34 -0500 (CDT) From: Joshua Lock To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <1270160485.6277.143.camel@trini-m4400> References: <1270160485.6277.143.camel@trini-m4400> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:35:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1270564528.9623.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.19.73.58 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: josh@linux.intel.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [oe-commits] Joshua Lock : packaged-staging: enhancements from Poky for fetching and relocatability X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:39:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 15:21 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 13:44 +0000, git version control wrote: > > Module: openembedded.git > > Branch: rpurdie/work-in-progress > > Commit: ccbb586b3cfdc723ccad73dd71d85f6d41f0e6a3 > > URL: http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=openembedded.git&a=commit;h=ccbb586b3cfdc723ccad73dd71d85f6d41f0e6a3 > > > > Author: Joshua Lock > > Date: Wed Mar 31 11:22:02 2010 +0100 > > > > packaged-staging: enhancements from Poky for fetching and relocatability > > Question. Do we really want to rename DEPLOY_DIR_PSTAGE to PSTAGE_DIR. > Is that really a nomenclature change like that? I see it's still soft > assign so outsideof TMPDIR can work still, so it's fine otherwise. Just > checking. > I changed the name because we now have two pstage directories and wanted the change to be apparent and I dropped the DEPLOY_ prefix as I moved the default location outside of the deploy dir. Does that seem reasonable? Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre