From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 3a.49.1343.static.theplanet.com ([67.19.73.58] helo=pug.o-hand.com ident=postfix) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzBau-0002xP-3X for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:25:41 +0200 Received: from [10.250.128.186] (unknown [158.43.2.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pug.o-hand.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3817C12EC21F for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:46:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Joshua Lock To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <1270160485.6277.143.camel@trini-m4400> <1270564528.9623.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1270566559.3340.9.camel@trini-m4400> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:22:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1270570937.24602.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.19.73.58 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: josh@linux.intel.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [oe-commits] Joshua Lock : packaged-staging: enhancements from Poky for fetching and relocatability X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:25:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 08:25 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:35 +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 15:21 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 13:44 +0000, git version control wrote: > > > > > Module: openembedded.git > > > > > Branch: rpurdie/work-in-progress > > > > > Commit: ccbb586b3cfdc723ccad73dd71d85f6d41f0e6a3 > > > > > URL: > > http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=openembedded.git&a=commit;h=ccbb586b3cfdc723ccad73dd71d85f6d41f0e6a3 > > > > > > > > > > Author: Joshua Lock > > > > > Date: Wed Mar 31 11:22:02 2010 +0100 > > > > > > > > > > packaged-staging: enhancements from Poky for fetching and > > relocatability > > > > > > > > Question. Do we really want to rename DEPLOY_DIR_PSTAGE to PSTAGE_DIR. > > > > Is that really a nomenclature change like that? I see it's still soft > > > > assign so outsideof TMPDIR can work still, so it's fine otherwise. > > Just > > > > checking. > > > > > > > > > > I changed the name because we now have two pstage directories and wanted > > > the change to be apparent and I dropped the DEPLOY_ prefix as I moved > > > the default location outside of the deploy dir. > > > > > > Does that seem reasonable? > > > > I think so, but I must be missing something. Are you talking about the > > dir where we assemble packages as the 2nd one? Or something else? > > Haven't made my coffee yet today... > > > I haven't looked at the patches in a while, but from what I recall, he > splits the dir where the pstage .ipk files go from the rest of the files > that cluttered up DEPLOY_DIR_PSTAGE. I could be remembering incorrectly, of > course (do that a *lot* :). My memory is recalling the same thing ;-) Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre