From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751606Ab0DJOAB (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:00:01 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:47609 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751317Ab0DJN77 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:59:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add "nested" field to event of lock_release From: Peter Zijlstra To: Hitoshi Mitake Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, h.mitake@gmail.com, Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Frederic Weisbecker In-Reply-To: <1270896100-7935-1-git-send-email-mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> References: <1270896100-7935-1-git-send-email-mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:59:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1270907986.4222.2.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 19:41 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > State machine of perf lock requires "nested" field of lock_release(), > so this patch adds it to event. > > Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Paul Mackerras > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker The nested flag only indicates if it could be nested, not if it was actually nested. So no, this doesn't make any sense at all. (in fact, pretty much every lock_release out there has nested=1)